Project Home
Project Home
Documents
Documents
Wiki
Wiki
Discussion Forums
Discussions
Project Information
Project Info
Forum Topic - sin: (10 Items)
   
sin  
It was reported a while ago that using sin with -n would make it core dump.  Today I started updating our custom image 
with the latest 6.4 to start testing it on our target hardware.  I was a bit surprise to see that M6 doesn't contain an 
updated sin.  

Note that I didn't try it yet, maybe the bug was in libc or some other component but i though I would let you guys knows
.

Re: sin  
It has been fixed.  I think sin is not included in the ntocore.  You should
give up all sin, and embrace pidin, my son. :-)

Seriously, here's an updated version if you really need it.

Mario Charest wrote:
> 
> It was reported a while ago that using sin with -n would make it core 
> dump.  Today I started updating our custom image with the latest 6.4 to 
> start testing it on our target hardware.  I was a bit surprise to see 
> that M6 doesn't contain an updated sin. 
> 
> Note that I didn't try it yet, maybe the bug was in libc or some other 
> component but i though I would let you guys knows.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSTech
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post7465
> 

-- 
cburgess@qnx.com

Attachment: Text sin 143.49 KB
Re: sin  
> It has been fixed.  I think sin is not included in the ntocore.  You should
> give up all sin, and embrace pidin, my son. :-)
> 

Nothing would please me better then to give up all sin father.  The dark side shall have me as a disciple until pidin 
can provide all of the wisdom that sin possesses..

> Seriously, here's an updated version if you really need it.
> 
> Mario Charest wrote:
> > 
> > It was reported a while ago that using sin with -n would make it core 
> > dump.  Today I started updating our custom image with the latest 6.4 to 
> > start testing it on our target hardware.  I was a bit surprise to see 
> > that M6 doesn't contain an updated sin. 
> > 
> > Note that I didn't try it yet, maybe the bug was in libc or some other 
> > component but i though I would let you guys knows.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > OSTech
> > http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post7465
> > 
> 
> -- 
> cburgess@qnx.com
> 


Re: sin  
What is pidin missing, in this case, my son?

For your penance, go read some stl template header files.

Mario Charest wrote:
>  > It has been fixed.  I think sin is not included in the ntocore.  You 
> should
>  > give up all sin, and embrace pidin, my son. :-)
>  >
> 
> Nothing would please me better then to give up all sin father.  The dark 
> side shall have me as a disciple until pidin can provide all of the 
> wisdom that sin possesses..
> 
>  > Seriously, here's an updated version if you really need it.
>  >
>  > Mario Charest wrote:
>  > >
>  > > It was reported a while ago that using sin with -n would make it core
>  > > dump.  Today I started updating our custom image with the latest 
> 6.4 to
>  > > start testing it on our target hardware.  I was a bit surprise to see
>  > > that M6 doesn't contain an updated sin.
>  > >
>  > > Note that I didn't try it yet, maybe the bug was in libc or some
other
>  > > component but i though I would let you guys knows.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > _______________________________________________
>  > > OSTech
>  > > http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post7465
>  > >
>  >
>  > --
>  > cburgess@qnx.com
>  >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSTech
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post7476
> 

-- 
cburgess@qnx.com
Re: sin  
> What is pidin missing, in this case, my son?
> 

When sin is run with no argument it show in a nice an concise way the memory usage of a process.  I have not find 
anything similar with pidin.

It would also be great to be able to see the physical address of memory 
allocated via /dev/zero ( physical memory )

I'm currently trying to get a machine with 8Gig working, I haven't found a way to detect if a drive has allocated dmable
 memore above 4Gig.

> For your penance, go read some stl template header files.

Is your heart fill with that much hatred?  Father, I will pray to the god of all gods to save you soul.  Say we all.



> 
> Mario Charest wrote:
> >  > It has been fixed.  I think sin is not included in the ntocore.  You 
> > should
> >  > give up all sin, and embrace pidin, my son. :-)
> >  >
> > 
> > Nothing would please me better then to give up all sin father.  The dark 
> > side shall have me as a disciple until pidin can provide all of the 
> > wisdom that sin possesses..
> > 
> >  > Seriously, here's an updated version if you really need it.
> >  >
> >  > Mario Charest wrote:
> >  > >
> >  > > It was reported a while ago that using sin with -n would make it core
> >  > > dump.  Today I started updating our custom image with the latest 
> > 6.4 to
> >  > > start testing it on our target hardware.  I was a bit surprise to see
> >  > > that M6 doesn't contain an updated sin.
> >  > >
> >  > > Note that I didn't try it yet, maybe the bug was in libc or some
> other
> >  > > component but i though I would let you guys knows.
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > _______________________________________________
> >  > > OSTech
> >  > > http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post7465
> >  > >
> >  >
> >  > --
> >  > cburgess@qnx.com
> >  >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > OSTech
> > http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post7476
> > 
> 
> -- 
> cburgess@qnx.com


Re: sin  
Mario Charest wrote:
>  > What is pidin missing, in this case, my son?
>  >
> 
> When sin is run with no argument it show in a nice an concise way the 
> memory usage of a process.  I have not find anything similar with pidin.

pidin pmem?  Admittedly it would be nice if it didn't show every thread...

> It would also be great to be able to see the physical address of memory
> allocated via /dev/zero ( physical memory )
> 
> I'm currently trying to get a machine with 8Gig working, I haven't found 
> a way to detect if a drive has allocated dmable memore above 4Gig.

Ok, I'll think about that.

>  > For your penance, go read some stl template header files.
> 
> Is your heart fill with that much hatred?  Father, I will pray to the 
> god of all gods to save you soul.  Say we all.

<insert duke nukem quip here>

:-)

>  > Mario Charest wrote:
>  > >  > It has been fixed.  I think sin is not included in the ntocore.  
> You
>  > > should
>  > >  > give up all sin, and embrace pidin, my son. :-)
>  > >  >
>  > >
>  > > Nothing would please me better then to give up all sin father.  The 
> dark
>  > > side shall have me as a disciple until pidin can provide all of the
>  > > wisdom that sin possesses..
>  > >
>  > >  > Seriously, here's an updated version if you really need it.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > Mario Charest wrote:
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > > It was reported a while ago that using sin with -n would make 
> it core
>  > >  > > dump.  Today I started updating our custom image with the latest
>  > > 6.4 to
>  > >  > > start testing it on our target hardware.  I was a bit surprise 
> to see
>  > >  > > that M6 doesn't contain an updated sin.
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > > Note that I didn't try it yet, maybe the bug was in libc or some
>  > other
>  > >  > > component but i though I would let you guys knows.
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > > _______________________________________________
>  > >  > > OSTech
>  > >  > > http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post7465
>  > >  > >
>  > >  >
>  > >  > --
>  > >  > cburgess@qnx.com
>  > >  >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > _______________________________________________
>  > > OSTech
>  > > http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post7476
>  > >
>  >
>  > --
>  > cburgess@qnx.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSTech
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post7479
> 

-- 
cburgess@qnx.com
Re: sin  
> It has been fixed.  I think sin is not included in the ntocore.  You should
> give up all sin, and embrace pidin, my son. :-)
> 
> Seriously, here's an updated version if you really need it.

Thanks.

Is it normal that it's almost twice as big as 6.3.2's sin.
Re: sin  
> > It has been fixed.  I think sin is not included in the ntocore.  You should
> > give up all sin, and embrace pidin, my son. :-)
> > 
> > Seriously, here's an updated version if you really need it.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Is it normal that it's almost twice as big as 6.3.2's sin.

I striped it but it still 116K compare with 88K.


Re: sin  
Did it get linked static somehow?

Mario Charest wrote:
>  > > It has been fixed.  I think sin is not included in the ntocore.  
> You should
>  > > give up all sin, and embrace pidin, my son. :-)
>  > >
>  > > Seriously, here's an updated version if you really need it.
>  >
>  > Thanks.
>  >
>  > Is it normal that it's almost twice as big as 6.3.2's sin.
> 
> I striped it but it still 116K compare with 88K.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSTech
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post7523
> 

-- 
cburgess@qnx.com
Re: sin  

> Did it get linked static somehow?
> 

I'm assuming you are not asking me right?