Michael Tasche
|
Re: clock_int_handler vs microkernel technology
|
Michael Tasche
07/31/2011 4:46 AM
post87717
|
Re: clock_int_handler vs microkernel technology
Just saw the latest Patch for qnx 6.5. (io-pkt)
Well, 2 years later, but they have done it.
Realtime is back, thanks very much.
-Michael
> Hi all,
>
> why do we need this interrupt-handler in the io-pkt process, which is fired by
> the timer-tick?
>
> This causes an unnecessary overhead in the system.
> We have a second tick-handler in a second process(io-pkt), which counts the
> time to fire a PULSE all 8 msec.
>
> Why can't we use the very good timer capabilities of the kernel ?
>
>
> Kind Regards
> Michael
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
|
|