03/17/2014 7:47 AM
post109451
|
This has been fixed since the release of 6.6.0. I haven¹t done any
throughput tests comparing TSO4 with checksum offload, so I guess that it
is best to experiment and see which gives you the better throughput.
On 2014/3/14, 3:47 PM, "Mario Charest" <community-noreply@qnx.com> wrote:
>The doc of 6.6 didn't mention that tso4 and checksums capability couldn't
>be activated together with e1000. I was told a while ago that they
>couldn't. Seems that hasn't changed with 6.6. Steve if you are reading
>this maybe it worth mentionning in the doc.
>
>I find it strange though because on the same hardware windows driver does
>have all these options actived without any issue.
>
>What's best for cpu load and/or throughput, TSO4 or CHECKSUM ?
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>General
>http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post109442
>To cancel your subscription to this discussion, please e-mail
>general-networking-unsubscribe@community.qnx.com
|
|
|