Core Development Tools/Discussion/General/stack size/List of Posts
 
Forum Topic - stack size:
   
Update
Mario Charest
07/18/2008 11:53 AM
post10735
stack size   
A program is compiled with qcc -N1000k but when I look at the program's memory information via the IDE it says the stack
 is 500k ( most of it unallocated ). 

Why the discrepancy?
Sean Boudreau(deleted)
07/18/2008 12:08 PM
post10737
Re: stack size   
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:53:47AM -0400, Mario Charest wrote:
> 
> A program is compiled with qcc -N1000k but when I look at the program's memory information via the IDE it says the 
stack is 500k ( most of it unallocated ). 
> 
> Why the discrepancy?

Does 'readelf -l <executeable> | grep NOTE' show anything.
Are you building with the gcc4 tools?

-seanb
Mario Charest
07/21/2008 11:58 AM
post10810
Re: stack size   
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:53:47AM -0400, Mario Charest wrote:
> > 
> > A program is compiled with qcc -N1000k but when I look at the program's 
> memory information via the IDE it says the stack is 500k ( most of it 
> unallocated ). 
> > 
> > Why the discrepancy?
> 
> Does 'readelf -l <executeable> | grep NOTE' show anything.

NOTE           0x05e28c 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00038 0x00000     0x4

> Are you building with the gcc4 tools?

No, with 3.3.5 but I just saw that the default is 4.2.1.  In theory all of our Makefiles force 3.3.5.  Maybe some of the
 4.2.1 binary are slipping in somehow


> 
> -seanb

Return