|
RE: RE: Network USB-Wi-Fi brand issue
|
04/09/2009 9:10 PM
post26661
|
RE: RE: Network USB-Wi-Fi brand issue
That's one of the things that is so difficult about consumer electronics
when it comes to support. The manufacturers often completely change the
innards with pretty much no means of being able to tell this from the
box. We recently recommended the linksys dongle to someone who picked
one up only to find that this was marked
"WUSB-54GCV3" and, as you've discovered, it actually contains a
different chipset. I'm not sure if it's a realtek. My understanding
was that it was another Ralink, but that it was a next gen RAL (2870, I
think) for which there is no driver (and it's new enough that there
doesn't appear to be a NetBSD driver available to port yet either).
In any case, if you did go out and buy one of these dongles you have my
apologies... This has, unfortunately, happened a number of times before
with other forms of USB dongles. We don't have enough clout with the
vendors to get notification when these changes are going to occur so
usually the only way that we find out is when someone picks up a new
device and it doesn't work.
Robert.
-----Original Message-----
From: Agoston Feher [mailto:community-noreply@qnx.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 6:41 PM
To: drivers-networking
Subject: Re: RE: Network USB-Wi-Fi brand issue
> We're using the Linksys WUSB-54GC internally with the rum driver, so
> that's the one that I'd recommend for you to use.
just a small notice to those who run to the shops to buy Linksys
WUSB-54GC:
the newer v2 version has a realtek chip that is not supported neither by
the rum nor the ral driver
_______________________________________________
Networking Drivers
http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post26656
|
|
|