TeamForge : Post

Forum Topic - Pulse queue freed by ChannelDestroy?:

View: as

John Murphy

11/18/2009 4:47 PM

post42203

Pulse queue freed by ChannelDestroy?

If there are still unreceived pulses when ChannelDestroy() is called, is 
the kernel space allocated to hold those pulses returned to the system, 
or is that the responsibility of the caller?

Murf

Brian Stecher(deleted)

11/19/2009 8:57 AM

post42226

Re: Pulse queue freed by ChannelDestroy?

The kernel will take care of releasing the memory.

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 04:47:39PM -0500, John Murphy wrote:
> If there are still unreceived pulses when ChannelDestroy() is called, is 
> the kernel space allocated to hold those pulses returned to the system, 
> or is that the responsibility of the caller?
> 
> Murf
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> OSTech
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post42203
> 

-- 
Brian Stecher (bstecher@qnx.com)        QNX Software Systems
phone: +1 (613) 591-0931 (voice)        175 Terence Matthews Cr.
       +1 (613) 591-3579 (fax)          Kanata, Ontario, Canada K2M 1W8

John Murphy

11/19/2009 9:21 AM

post42228

Re: Pulse queue freed by ChannelDestroy?

Thanks!

Murf

Brian Stecher wrote:
> The kernel will take care of releasing the memory.
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 04:47:39PM -0500, John Murphy wrote:
>   
>> If there are still unreceived pulses when ChannelDestroy() is called, is 
>> the kernel space allocated to hold those pulses returned to the system, 
>> or is that the responsibility of the caller?
>>
>> Murf
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> OSTech
>> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post42203
>>
>>     
>
>

Return