Something must have gone wrong with your build of the new image(didn’t use the 650SP1 installed bins/libs)….what is the output from running mkifs with –vvvv option.

Also, what is the output from the following on your 2 machines?

ls -l /.boot

From: Mark Dowdy [mailto:community-noreply@qnx.com]
Sent: August-15-12 8:53 PM
To: ostech-core_os@community.qnx.com
Subject: 6.5.0SP1 devc-ser8250 error

I installed 6.5.0 SP1 on my target machine, and my windows development machine, and built an updated boot file. When I attempt to load my boot file, I get the following error:

ldd:FATAL: Unresolved symbol "hwi_find_item" called from Executable

I saw topc22117 and collected the information below. As far as I know, this is not a pre-release version of SP1; I pulled qnxsdp-6.5.0SP1-201206270843-nto.sh and qnxsdp-6.5.0SP1-201206261830-win32.exe from qnx.com on August 6^th.

# use -i libc.so.3

NAME=libc.so

DESCRIPTION=C runtime library

DATE=2010/07/09-12:54:28-EDT

STATE=stable

HOST=mainbuild

USER=builder

VERSION=6.5.0

TAGID=89

# uname -a

QNX MCC 6.5.0 2010/07/09-14:44:03EDT x86pc x86

MCC# use -i /proc/boot/libc.so

NAME=libc.so

DESCRIPTION=C runtime library

DATE=2010/07/09-12:54:28-EDT

STATE=stable

HOST=mainbuild

USER=builder

VERSION=6.5.0

TAGID=89

# ls -l /proc/boot

total 4268

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root          22294 Jul 09  2010 cam-cdrom.so

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root          13738 Jul 09  2010 cam-disk.so

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root         107156 Jul 09  2010 devb-eide

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root         107815 Jul 09  2010 devc-con-hid

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root          58750 Jul 09  2010 devh-ps2ser.so

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root          21382 Jul 09  2010 fesh

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root          49356 Jul 09  2010 fs-cd.so

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root          78433 Jul 09  2010 fs-dos.so

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root          56333 Jul 09  2010 fs-ext2.so

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root          72902 Jul 09  2010 fs-qnx6.so

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root          85618 Jul 09  2010 fs-udf.so

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root         169908 Jul 09  2010 io-blk.so

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root          33170 Jul 09  2010 io-hid

lrwxrwxrwx  1 root      root              9 Jul 09  2010 libc.so -> libc.so.3

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root         513152 Jul 09  2010 libc.so.3

lrwxrwxrwx  1 root      root             11 Jul 09  2010 libcam.so -> libcam.so.2

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root          73504 Jul 09  2010 libcam.so.2

lrwxrwxrwx  1 root      root             13 Jul 09  2010 libhiddi.so -> libhiddi.so.1

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root          27906 Jul 09  2010 libhiddi.so.1

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root          64148 Jul 09  2010 pci-bios

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root         593920 Jul 09  2010 procnto-smp-instr

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root          13001 Jul 09  2010 seedres

-rwxrwxrwx  1 root      root          14636 Jul 09  2010 slogger

-rw-rw-rw-  1 root      root            620 May 06  2011 startup-script

-rw-rw-rw-  1 root      root             18 May 06  2011 unlink_list

As was the case in topc22117, it looks like the binaries are ‘old’. Why is that? Is there more required to install SP1 than running the .exe on my development machine and the .sh on my target? Thanks.

Mark