Project Home
Project Home		 Source Code
Source Code		 Documents
Documents		 Wiki
Wiki		 Discussion Forums
Discussions		 Project Information
Project Info
QNX Community pkgsrc Project/Discussion/General/The Dangers of APR/List of Posts
Forum Topic - The Dangers of APR: (8 Items)
   
Update
Mitchell Schoenbrun
10/02/2007 4:28 PM
post1768
The Dangers of APR   
Here's a little gotcha that I think I understand.
I tried running "svn up ..." and got an error:
Could not find library libaprutil-0.so.0

I took a look in /usr/pkg/lib and found libaprutil-1.so.0, but not the libaprutil-0.so.0.   I've recently installed the 
package APR, which is version 1.2.9, but I think that the svn that comes in the bootstrap needs a different version.   
Just a guess here.

I'm trying to build and install svn to see if that fixes the problem.
Mitchell Schoenbrun
10/02/2007 4:37 PM
post1769
Re: The Dangers of APR   
It gets worse.  svn fails to build with the error

===> Installing for apr-0.9.16.2.0.61
ERROR:apr-1.2.9 is already installed -perhaps an older version?


It would seem that this tree wants 0.9.16 for svn, but 1.2.9 for apache.
I thought that wasn't supposed to happen?
Sean Boudreau(deleted)
10/02/2007 5:03 PM
post1772
Re: The Dangers of APR   
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 04:37:57PM -0400, Mitchell Schoenbrun wrote:
> It gets worse.  svn fails to build with the error
> 
> ===> Installing for apr-0.9.16.2.0.61
> ERROR:apr-1.2.9 is already installed -perhaps an older version?
> 
> 
> It would seem that this tree wants 0.9.16 for svn, but 1.2.9 for apache.
> I thought that wasn't supposed to happen?

It looks to me like subversion and apache2 want devel/apr0.
Did you install devel/apr?  Try 'pkg_delete apr' then
building svn, apache2.

-seanb
Mitchell Schoenbrun
10/02/2007 5:20 PM
post1773
Re: The Dangers of APR   
>> It would seem that this tree wants 0.9.16 for svn, but 1.2.9 for apache.
> I thought that wasn't supposed to happen?

I don't think that's it.   I apache wants the later version and svn wants the newer version.   Thus if I install apache,
 svn no longer works.

The plot thinkens.   I uninstalled apr, which required that I uninstall apache and one other package first.   Then I 
tried to make svn.
It remake the version of apr that it liked, but there
appears to be some additional problems with svn.
While linking libsvn_ra_dav-1.so, a number of ne_*() routines from
neon were not found.   But neon is installed?

I tried to get svn back now by running bootstrap.
This make failed because bootstrap was already installed.
I tried to uninstall bootstrap, and learned that
"bootstraped is marked as not for deletion".

So I'm down to the bottom.   I'm going to delete all
and start from scratch.
Xiaodan Tang(deleted)
10/02/2007 9:35 PM
post1774
Re: The Dangers of APR   
I think you can do a "bootstrap cleanup".

Not sure. Try "bootstrap --help" and see.
Mitchell Schoenbrun
10/03/2007 9:39 PM
post1800
Re: The Dangers of APR   
> I think you can do a "bootstrap cleanup".
> 
> Not sure. Try "bootstrap --help" and see. 


No such luck.   I've started from scratch and I learned that pkgsrc doesn't like symbolic links.   I had something like 
this:

ln -s /fs/hd1-qnx/usr/pkg /usr/pkg

When building my first package, tar had a message something like:
/usr/pkg/blah-blah resolves to /fs/hd1-qnx/usr/pkg/blah blah, attempt to write outside of current working directory 
aborted.

Soooo, I gave up on that.   Now in my second attempt all seems to be going smoother.   I'm still not sure what to do 
about the snv/Apache/apr problem.
Sean Boudreau(deleted)
10/03/2007 11:49 PM
post1805
Re: The Dangers of APR   
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:39:55PM -0400, Mitchell Schoenbrun wrote:
> > I think you can do a "bootstrap cleanup".
> > 
> > Not sure. Try "bootstrap --help" and see. 
> 
> 
> No such luck.   I've started from scratch and I learned that pkgsrc
> doesn't like symbolic links.   I had something like this:
> 
> ln -s /fs/hd1-qnx/usr/pkg /usr/pkg
> 
> When building my first package, tar had a message something like:
> /usr/pkg/blah-blah resolves to /fs/hd1-qnx/usr/pkg/blah blah, attempt to
> write outside of current working directory aborted.
> 
> Soooo, I gave up on that.   Now in my second attempt all seems to be
> going smoother.   I'm still not sure what to do about the snv/Apache/apr
> problem.

Are you trying to install devel/apr or devel/apr0, apache or apache2?
AFAICT, svn and apache2 both want apr0 so if you stay away from apr
and apache things should be OK?

-seanb
Mitchell Schoenbrun
10/04/2007 2:06 AM
post1807
Re: The Dangers of APR   
the Makefile in Apache22 decides to use either apr or apr0 based on some question I don't understand.

On my system, it has always installed apr, not apr0.
I'm a little confused about this, as apr and apr0 are both for the same package "apr" but different versions.  Can they 
both exist together?
I'm pretty sure I saw the installation of one, remove the other.

Return


  A subsidiary of BlackBerry             All content ©2004-2013, QNX Software Systems