|
Sean Boudreau(deleted)
|
Re: HEAD or pkgsrc-2007Q2?
|
|
Sean Boudreau(deleted)
09/25/2007 10:06 AM
post1565
|
Re: HEAD or pkgsrc-2007Q2?
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 01:06:21AM -0400, Rick Duff wrote:
> Not that I can currently commit anything, but should I be playing in the
> HEAD branch, or the pkgsrc-2007Q2 branch?
>
> The reasons I ask is it appears that there are newer commits in the
> pkgsrc-2007Q2 branch, but the docs/web pages say the recent work is
> being done in the HEAD branch?
>
I'm working in the HEAD. Just cleaning up some stuff before
the next commit.
I guess the idea is not to neglect the HEAD. It's fine to
get something working in a quarterly branch but try to get
it working in the HEAD as well.
-seanb
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xiaodan Tang(deleted)
|
Re: HEAD or pkgsrc-2007Q2?
|
|
Xiaodan Tang(deleted)
09/25/2007 10:23 AM
post1567
|
Re: HEAD or pkgsrc-2007Q2?
> Not that I can currently commit anything, but should I be playing in the HEAD
> branch, or the pkgsrc-2007Q2 branch?
>
> The reasons I ask is it appears that there are newer commits in the pkgsrc-
> 2007Q2 branch, but the docs/web pages say the recent work is being done in the
> HEAD branch?
>
> Just curious..
I just try to built some base package in 2007Q2, to get people's life easier if they want to built 2007Q2 package. Find
some issue when building them on 6.3.2, that's why the commit.
I will soon switch to built packages in HEAD, and will post binary packages.
|
|
|
|
|
