Michael Tasche
|
netbsd vs. embedded Tagets
|
Michael Tasche
09/03/2009 5:19 AM
post37241
|
netbsd vs. embedded Tagets
Hi all,
we have several embedded boards, which are driven by ppc405, ppc440, mpc5200,... cpu's from 200...500 Mhz.
We made some performance tests under QNX and Linux.
It is not possible, to set up a tcp or udp connection, which results in a full utilized 100MBit ethernet line.
e.g. ppc405gpr 266 Mhz:
tcp discard = 4.8MByte/sec.
28677 io-pkt-v4 2866 95% 95%
868372 inetd 79 2% 2%
tcp chargen = 0.5MByte/sec.
28677 io-pkt-v4 2215 79% 73%
864276 inetd 522 18% 17%
Well, the network is very slow and consumes very much cpu cycles.
Do we need a tiny tcp stack in the future again?
Why is the net bsd stack statically linked with io-pkt?
Is the net bsd stack secure but too slow for an embedded system?
Do you plan to get rid of the timer-tick irq handler in io-pkt?
It is not nice to have an irq in the io-pkt process every ms.
The networking driver for the ppc405 seems to be ok.(zero copy)
We are planning to get rid of the shim layer as a first step.
Is there anybody working on the devnp- port for devn-ppc405.so out there?
If not, we could do that.
BTW the same system under linux tranfers the full possible bandwith in both directions. Ok, we do not need to have that
much performance. The realtime behaviour is more important, but 0.5MB chargen with 90% system-load is not ok.
Kind Regards
Michael
Well,
|
|
|