Project Home
Project Home
Wiki
Wiki
Discussion Forums
Discussions
Project Information
Project Info
Forum Topic - slog entries: (6 Items)
   
slog entries  
With 6.3.2.

qnet is filling the slog data with entries ( all entries are normal ).  Any way to turn this off?  The documentation 
says that qnet is not verbose by default.  Or even better to change this on the fly?

- Mario
RE: slog entries  
Hi Mario:
	Certainly is a way...

"use /lib/dll/npm-qnet.so"

You'll see part way down "no_slog=[X]"

"Specifying a non-zero value to this option instructs qnet not to log errors
or events to slogger."

	Robert.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Charest [mailto:mcharest@zinformatic.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:06 PM
To: technology-networking
Subject: slog entries


With 6.3.2.

qnet is filling the slog data with entries ( all entries are normal ).  Any
way to turn this off?  The documentation says that qnet is not verbose by
default.  Or even better to change this on the fly?

- Mario

_______________________________________________
Technology
http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post4668
Re: RE: slog entries  
> Hi Mario:
> 	Certainly is a way...
> 
> "use /lib/dll/npm-qnet.so"
> 
> You'll see part way down "no_slog=[X]"
> 

Grrrr I hate being caught with my pants down with a case of RTFM.  To my defense this not documented in the online doc 
which I checked prior to posting ;-)

> "Specifying a non-zero value to this option instructs qnet not to log errors
> or events to slogger."
> 
> 	Robert.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mario Charest [mailto:mcharest@zinformatic.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:06 PM
> To: technology-networking
> Subject: slog entries
> 
> 
> With 6.3.2.
> 
> qnet is filling the slog data with entries ( all entries are normal ).  Any
> way to turn this off?  The documentation says that qnet is not verbose by
> default.  Or even better to change this on the fly?
> 
> - Mario
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Technology
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post4668


RE: RE: slog entries  
I'm completely with you on this one.  If it's any consolation, PR55172 has
just been raised, so someone else will be feeling your pain (;->).

	Robert.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Charest [mailto:mcharest@zinformatic.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 5:43 PM
To: technology-networking
Subject: Re: RE: slog entries

> Hi Mario:
> 	Certainly is a way...
> 
> "use /lib/dll/npm-qnet.so"
> 
> You'll see part way down "no_slog=[X]"
> 

Grrrr I hate being caught with my pants down with a case of RTFM.  To my
defense this not documented in the online doc which I checked prior to
posting ;-)

> "Specifying a non-zero value to this option instructs qnet not to log
errors
> or events to slogger."
> 
> 	Robert.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mario Charest [mailto:mcharest@zinformatic.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:06 PM
> To: technology-networking
> Subject: slog entries
> 
> 
> With 6.3.2.
> 
> qnet is filling the slog data with entries ( all entries are normal ).
Any
> way to turn this off?  The documentation says that qnet is not verbose by
> default.  Or even better to change this on the fly?
> 
> - Mario
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Technology
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post4668




_______________________________________________
Technology
http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post4786
Re: RE: RE: slog entries  
> I'm completely with you on this one.  If it's any consolation, PR55172 has
> just been raised, so someone else will be feeling your pain (;->).

LOL!

By the way, it would be great to be able to change this setting on the fly.

> 
> 	Robert.
> 
RE: RE: slog entries  
Too late -- I already felt that pain and fixed the docs for the next release
(see PR 25766).


Steve Reid (stever@qnx.com)
Technical Editor
QNX Software Systems 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Craig [mailto:rcraig@qnx.com] 
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 5:59 PM
> To: technology-networking
> Subject: RE: RE: slog entries
> 
> I'm completely with you on this one.  If it's any 
> consolation, PR55172 has just been raised, so someone else 
> will be feeling your pain (;->).
> 
> 	Robert.
>