Xiaodan Tang(deleted)
|
Re: RE: qnet and two subnet
|
Xiaodan Tang(deleted)
11/29/2007 7:27 PM
post3140
|
Re: RE: qnet and two subnet
I can't try it now and this is all from memory...
The resolver is bound to "mountpoint", so you suppose to put you remote
machines under a different resolver. Like:
mount=/net,resolver=ndp,mount=/remote.com,resolver=dns
Now how can this co-exist with bind= option, I don't know for sure...
-xtang
-----Original Message-----
From: Mario Charest <mcharest@zinformatic.com>
To: technology-networking <post3126@community.qnx.com>
Sent: Thu Nov 29 14:53:41 2007
Subject: Re: RE: qnet and two subnet
> You can't run two independent versions of qnet (one IP and one Ethernet),
so
> that's not an option...
>
> We've talked about this a little bit internally. Technically speaking,
> because the IP and Ethernet are two different l4 layers, it "should" be
> possible to get the upper qnet layer to use them simultaneously. However,
> we're not sure what we'd do with the command line parsing to enable the
two
> layers to get arguments independently.
>
> You can, of course, use DNS for the resolver instead if you're running
over
> IP, but this does indeed have it's own issues so I can understand why
you'd
> want to stick with the NDP resolver.
>
> So I guess that the short answer is that simultaneous IP / Ethernet isn't
> officially supported but may be technically possible. We'll have to spend
> some time looking into it when we get freed up from the current work load.
>
> (I know... sounds like it won't happen in the very near future....)
>
> Robert.
>
Cool. I was afraid the solution what just in front of me and I couldn't see
it ;-)
_______________________________________________
Technology
http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post3126
|
|
|