maurice gibbs(deleted)
|
ping6 -h option seems to fail
|
maurice gibbs(deleted)
08/27/2009 6:58 PM
post36838
|
ping6 -h option seems to fail
Hi,
Does the ping6 -h option work? Here's an example of a test I did:
# ping6 -h2 fe80::201:9cff:fe00:477
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) fe80::201:9cff:fe00:477%en0 -->
fe80::201:9cff:fe00:477
16 bytes from fe80::201:9cff:fe00:477%en0, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=0 ms
16 bytes from fe80::201:9cff:fe00:477%en0, icmp_seq=1 hlim=64 time=0 ms
16 bytes from fe80::201:9cff:fe00:477%en0, icmp_seq=2 hlim=64 time=0 ms
16 bytes from fe80::201:9cff:fe00:477%en0, icmp_seq=3 hlim=64 time=0 ms
16 bytes from fe80::201:9cff:fe00:477%en0, icmp_seq=4 hlim=64 time=0 ms
16 bytes from fe80::201:9cff:fe00:477%en0, icmp_seq=5 hlim=64 time=0 ms
--- fe80::201:9cff:fe00:477 ping6 statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0/0/0 ms
variance = 0 ms^2
Process 856116 (ping6) terminated SIGINT code=0 by process 856116
value=0.
#
Should the hlim not =2 instead of =64??
Cheers,
maurice
Maurice Gibbs
Software Designer
CommTest WaveReady BU
JDS Uniphase Corp.
613.843.2326
|
|
|