Project Home
Project Home
Wiki
Wiki
Discussion Forums
Discussions
Project Information
Project Info
Forum Topic - tso4 and checksum: (2 Items)
   
tso4 and checksum  
The doc of 6.6 didn't mention that tso4 and checksums capability couldn't be activated together with e1000.  I was told 
a while ago that they couldn't.  Seems that hasn't changed with 6.6.  Steve if you are reading this maybe it worth 
mentionning in the doc.

I find it strange though because on the same hardware windows driver does have all these options actived without any 
issue.

What's best for cpu load and/or throughput, TSO4 or CHECKSUM ?
Re: tso4 and checksum  
This has been fixed since the release of 6.6.0. I haven¹t done any
throughput tests comparing TSO4 with checksum offload, so I guess that it
is best to experiment and see which gives you the better throughput.




On 2014/3/14, 3:47 PM, "Mario Charest" <community-noreply@qnx.com> wrote:

>The doc of 6.6 didn't mention that tso4 and checksums capability couldn't
>be activated together with e1000.  I was told a while ago that they
>couldn't.  Seems that hasn't changed with 6.6.  Steve if you are reading
>this maybe it worth mentionning in the doc.
>
>I find it strange though because on the same hardware windows driver does
>have all these options actived without any issue.
>
>What's best for cpu load and/or throughput, TSO4 or CHECKSUM ?
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>General
>http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post109442
>To cancel your subscription to this discussion, please e-mail
>general-networking-unsubscribe@community.qnx.com