Hello, I often post with updated e1000. Has the i82544 also been kept uptodate, I'm looking for the irq_threshold featurs. Also I read somewhere that i82544 can perform better under heavy load ( less interrupt for the same amount of network traffic? )
No, the i82544 driver hasn't been updated, only the e1000. -- Hugh Brown QNX Software Systems Limited 1001 Farrar Rd., Ottawa. ON. K2K 0B3. Telephone: 613-591-0931 On 12-03-29 11:43 AM, "Mario Charest" <community-noreply@qnx.com> wrote: >Hello, > >I often post with updated e1000. Has the i82544 also been kept uptodate, >I'm looking for the irq_threshold featurs. Also I read somewhere that >i82544 can perform better under heavy load ( less interrupt for the same >amount of network traffic? ) > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Networking Drivers >http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post92359 >
> -----Message d'origine----- > De : Hugh Brown [mailto:community-noreply@qnx.com] > Envoyé : 29 mars 2012 11:46 > À : drivers-networking > Objet : Re: i82544 > > No, the i82544 driver hasn't been updated, only the e1000. Thanks for the info. Is it true that this driver can reduce CPU (interrupt) overhead compare to the e1000? > > -- > Hugh Brown > QNX Software Systems Limited > 1001 Farrar Rd., > Ottawa. ON. K2K 0B3. > Telephone: 613-591-0931 > > > > > > > > On 12-03-29 11:43 AM, "Mario Charest" <community-noreply@qnx.com> > wrote: > > >Hello, > > > >I often post with updated e1000. Has the i82544 also been kept uptodate, > >I'm looking for the irq_threshold featurs. Also I read somewhere that > >i82544 can perform better under heavy load ( less interrupt for the same > >amount of network traffic? ) > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >Networking Drivers > >http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post92359 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Networking Drivers > http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post92360 >
The latest e1000 driver has a new command line option to allow you to change the interrupt moderation value, so you can inform the driver to interrupt more or less for received packets. -- Hugh Brown QNX Software Systems Limited 1001 Farrar Rd., Ottawa. ON. K2K 0B3. Telephone: 613-591-0931 On 12-03-29 1:10 PM, "Mario Charest" <community-noreply@qnx.com> wrote: > > >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Hugh Brown [mailto:community-noreply@qnx.com] >> Envoyé : 29 mars 2012 11:46 >> À : drivers-networking >> Objet : Re: i82544 >> >> No, the i82544 driver hasn't been updated, only the e1000. > >Thanks for the info. Is it true that this driver can reduce CPU >(interrupt) overhead compare to the e1000? > >> >> -- >> Hugh Brown >> QNX Software Systems Limited >> 1001 Farrar Rd., >> Ottawa. ON. K2K 0B3. >> Telephone: 613-591-0931 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 12-03-29 11:43 AM, "Mario Charest" <community-noreply@qnx.com> >> wrote: >> >> >Hello, >> > >> >I often post with updated e1000. Has the i82544 also been kept >>uptodate, >> >I'm looking for the irq_threshold featurs. Also I read somewhere that >> >i82544 can perform better under heavy load ( less interrupt for the >>same >> >amount of network traffic? ) >> > >> > >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> > >> >Networking Drivers >> >http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post92359 >> > >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Networking Drivers >> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post92360 >> > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Networking Drivers >http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post92365
