Project Home
Project Home
Wiki
Wiki
Discussion Forums
Discussions
Project Information
Project Info
Forum Topic - Intel 52599 10G: (7 Items)
   
Intel 52599 10G  
Is a driver for the Intel 82599 scheduled for any time soon?  Just wanted to ask before re-inventing the wheel...

Thanks,
lew
RE: Intel 52599 10G  
Not that I'm aware of.


-----Original Message-----
From: Lewis Donzis [mailto:community-noreply@qnx.com] 
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 1:19 PM
To: drivers-networking
Subject: Intel 52599 10G

Is a driver for the Intel 82599 scheduled for any time soon?  Just
wanted to ask before re-inventing the wheel...

Thanks,
lew



_______________________________________________

Networking Drivers
http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post43754
Re: Intel 52599 10G  
Did anyone got the QNX driver for intel  82599/8 ?

Thanks,
Satish
Re: Intel 52599 10G  
If  Hugh isn't aware of one, I don't know who would be!!

So we wrote our own.

lew
Re: Intel 52599 10G  
We don't have any 10G network drivers.



On 10-02-04 8:52 AM, "Lewis Donzis" <community-noreply@qnx.com> wrote:

> If  Hugh isn't aware of one, I don't know who would be!!
> 
> So we wrote our own.
> 
> lew
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Networking Drivers
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post46525
> 
RE: Intel 52599 10G  
> we wrote our own.

Would you like to post it to the foundry?

I promise you will never, ever receive a 
single support question about it  :) :)

--
aboyd
Re: RE: Intel 52599 10G  
I don't think we would mind, but there are a few issues right now:

1. We did all of our development on the 82599, so we don't even have a '598 to test with right now,
2. For expediency and because we have a large code base of filters for testing, we initially developed the driver for io
-net, and figured we'd just re-do it for io-pkt later, and
3. The chip is not only an order of magnitude faster than the 1G chips, it's an order of magnitude more complicated and 
loaded with "features."  Getting a functional driver that sends and receives packets and generally works the way you 
would expect wasn't too bad, but we've been spending a lot of time fooling with the various advanced features to see how
 (and whether) they work, along with their respective benefit (which in some cases is negative!)

So in other words, we're not opposed to it, but we're not there yet.

lew