In essence, there is no difference, on a Neutrino run-time target,
libgf.so should be a link to libgf.so.1, this is the same on a Neutrino
host as well.

If you are developing on a Windows box with Neutrino SDP installed,
Windows does not support links, so there will be two separate files, but
they _should_ be identical to one another.

You should link against the libgf.so ... I cannot comment on the
behaviour changes, as I am not sure what would cause it.

-Derek

-----Original Message-----
From: Kailen High [mailto:community-noreply@qnx.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 6:03 AM
To: opengles-graphics
Subject: the differnce between libgf.so and libgf.so.1

Hello everyone!
     When  I complie a binary named gf_test ,I linked the dynamic lib
(libgf.so.1),As a result , the error tips that :cannot find -lgf.so.but
when I linked the dynamic lib(
libgf.so),the compling is successful. Then I run the gf_test with
DL_DEBUG=1,the lib(libgf.so.1) is loaded.
      what is the difference between libgf.so and libgf.so.1?
      why did I complie gf_test  with libgf.so,  the libgf.so.1 is
loaded when running gf_test?
      Please give me some advice ,thanks!



_______________________________________________

OpenGL ES
http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post67537