Project Home
Project Home		 Documents
Documents		 Wiki
Wiki		 Discussion Forums
Discussions		 Project Information
Project Info
QNX Operating System/Discussion/OSTech/6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type/List of Posts
Forum Topic - 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type: (13 Items)
   
Update
Mario Charest
04/24/2009 5:06 PM
post28073
6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type   
I use 7za and when I run in it 6.4.1 I get:

bad weak relocation type
bad weak relocation type
bad weak relocation type
bad weak relocation type

Running ldd shows:

Could not resolve all symbols
        libcpp.so.4 => /lib/libcpp.so.4 (0xb8200000)
        libc.so.2 => /lib/libc.so.2 (0xb8262000)
        libc.so.3 => /usr/lib/ldqnx.so.2 (0xb0300000)

Running with DL_DEBUG=1

load_object: attempt load of libcpp.so.4
load_elf32: loaded lib at addr b8200000(text) b825af58(data)
load_object: attempt load of libc.so.2
load_elf32: loaded lib at addr b8262000(text) b8267810(data)
bad weak relocation type
bad weak relocation type
bad weak relocation type
bad weak relocation type
Could not resolve all symbols
Colin Burgess(deleted)
04/26/2009 7:09 PM
post28098
Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type   
Can you send the 7za binary please?


Mario Charest wrote:
> I use 7za and when I run in it 6.4.1 I get:
> 
> bad weak relocation type
> bad weak relocation type
> bad weak relocation type
> bad weak relocation type
> 
> Running ldd shows:
> 
> Could not resolve all symbols
>         libcpp.so.4 => /lib/libcpp.so.4 (0xb8200000)
>         libc.so.2 => /lib/libc.so.2 (0xb8262000)
>         libc.so.3 => /usr/lib/ldqnx.so.2 (0xb0300000)
> 
> Running with DL_DEBUG=1
> 
> load_object: attempt load of libcpp.so.4
> load_elf32: loaded lib at addr b8200000(text) b825af58(data)
> load_object: attempt load of libc.so.2
> load_elf32: loaded lib at addr b8262000(text) b8267810(data)
> bad weak relocation type
> bad weak relocation type
> bad weak relocation type
> bad weak relocation type
> Could not resolve all symbols
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSTech
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28073
> 

-- 
cburgess@qnx.com
Mario Charest
04/27/2009 8:34 AM
post28118
Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type   
> Can you send the 7za binary please?
> 
> 
There you go
Attachment: Text 7za.7z 322.76 KB
Colin Burgess(deleted)
04/27/2009 1:14 PM
post28167
Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type   
PR67804

Mario Charest wrote:
>> Can you send the 7za binary please?
>>
>>
> There you go
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSTech
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28118

-- 
cburgess@qnx.com
Neil Schellenberger(deleted)
04/27/2009 1:25 PM
post28168
Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type   
Perhaps libc.so.2 would be a good candidate for a filter/aux
implementation in the future?

On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 13:14 -0400, Colin Burgess wrote:
> PR67804
> 
> Mario Charest wrote:
> >> Can you send the 7za binary please?
> >>
> >>
> > There you go
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > OSTech
> > http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28118
>
Colin Burgess(deleted)
04/27/2009 1:43 PM
post28170
Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type   
Possibly, but in this case libcpp.so.4 is missing symbols that the 6.4.0 version had... :-)

Certainly a better error message is warranted - but post 6.4.1 the way things are looking right now.

Colin

Neil Schellenberger wrote:
> Perhaps libc.so.2 would be a good candidate for a filter/aux
> implementation in the future?
> 
> On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 13:14 -0400, Colin Burgess wrote:
>> PR67804
>>
>> Mario Charest wrote:
>>>> Can you send the 7za binary please?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> There you go
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSTech
>>> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28118
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSTech
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28168
> 

-- 
cburgess@qnx.com
Mario Charest
04/27/2009 1:45 PM
post28171
RE: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type   

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colin Burgess [mailto:community-noreply@qnx.com]
> Sent: April-27-09 1:44 PM
> To: ostech-core_os
> Subject: Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type
> 
> Possibly, but in this case libcpp.so.4 is missing symbols that the
> 6.4.0 version had... :-)
> 
> Certainly a better error message is warranted - but post 6.4.1 the way
> things are looking right now.

What`s post 6.4.1, fixing the missing symbols or better error messages?

> 
> Colin
> 
> Neil Schellenberger wrote:
> > Perhaps libc.so.2 would be a good candidate for a filter/aux
> > implementation in the future?
> >
> > On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 13:14 -0400, Colin Burgess wrote:
> >> PR67804
> >>
> >> Mario Charest wrote:
> >>>> Can you send the 7za binary please?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> There you go
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> OSTech
> >>> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28118
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OSTech
> > http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28168
> >
> 
> --
> cburgess@qnx.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSTech
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28170
>
Colin Burgess(deleted)
04/27/2009 1:46 PM
post28172
Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type   
error messages... :-)

Mario Charest wrote:
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Colin Burgess [mailto:community-noreply@qnx.com]
>> Sent: April-27-09 1:44 PM
>> To: ostech-core_os
>> Subject: Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type
>>
>> Possibly, but in this case libcpp.so.4 is missing symbols that the
>> 6.4.0 version had... :-)
>>
>> Certainly a better error message is warranted - but post 6.4.1 the way
>> things are looking right now.
> 
> What`s post 6.4.1, fixing the missing symbols or better error messages?
> 
>> Colin
>>
>> Neil Schellenberger wrote:
>>> Perhaps libc.so.2 would be a good candidate for a filter/aux
>>> implementation in the future?
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 13:14 -0400, Colin Burgess wrote:
>>>> PR67804
>>>>
>>>> Mario Charest wrote:
>>>>>> Can you send the 7za binary please?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> There you go
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OSTech
>>>>> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28118
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSTech
>>> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28168
>>>
>> --
>> cburgess@qnx.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSTech
>> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28170
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSTech
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28171
> 

-- 
cburgess@qnx.com
Mario Charest
04/27/2009 1:48 PM
post28173
RE: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type   

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colin Burgess [mailto:community-noreply@qnx.com]
> Sent: April-27-09 1:46 PM
> To: ostech-core_os
> Subject: Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type
> 
> error messages... :-)
> 

Phew, putting pin back in the grenade now.

> Mario Charest wrote:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Colin Burgess [mailto:community-noreply@qnx.com]
> >> Sent: April-27-09 1:44 PM
> >> To: ostech-core_os
> >> Subject: Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type
> >>
> >> Possibly, but in this case libcpp.so.4 is missing symbols that the
> >> 6.4.0 version had... :-)
> >>
> >> Certainly a better error message is warranted - but post 6.4.1 the
> way
> >> things are looking right now.
> >
> > What`s post 6.4.1, fixing the missing symbols or better error
> messages?
> >
> >> Colin
> >>
> >> Neil Schellenberger wrote:
> >>> Perhaps libc.so.2 would be a good candidate for a filter/aux
> >>> implementation in the future?
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 13:14 -0400, Colin Burgess wrote:
> >>>> PR67804
> >>>>
> >>>> Mario Charest wrote:
> >>>>>> Can you send the 7za binary please?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> There you go
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> OSTech
> >>>>> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28118
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> OSTech
> >>> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28168
> >>>
> >> --
> >> cburgess@qnx.com
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OSTech
> >> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28170
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OSTech
> > http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28171
> >
> 
> --
> cburgess@qnx.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSTech
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28172
>
Colin Burgess(deleted)
04/27/2009 1:49 PM
post28174
Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type   
Scenes from "Return of the Jedi" come to mind...

Mario Charest wrote:
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Colin Burgess [mailto:community-noreply@qnx.com]
>> Sent: April-27-09 1:46 PM
>> To: ostech-core_os
>> Subject: Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type
>>
>> error messages... :-)
>>
> 
> Phew, putting pin back in the grenade now.
> 
>> Mario Charest wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Colin Burgess [mailto:community-noreply@qnx.com]
>>>> Sent: April-27-09 1:44 PM
>>>> To: ostech-core_os
>>>> Subject: Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type
>>>>
>>>> Possibly, but in this case libcpp.so.4 is missing symbols that the
>>>> 6.4.0 version had... :-)
>>>>
>>>> Certainly a better error message is warranted - but post 6.4.1 the
>> way
>>>> things are looking right now.
>>> What`s post 6.4.1, fixing the missing symbols or better error
>> messages?
>>>> Colin
>>>>
>>>> Neil Schellenberger wrote:
>>>>> Perhaps libc.so.2 would be a good candidate for a filter/aux
>>>>> implementation in the future?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 13:14 -0400, Colin Burgess wrote:
>>>>>> PR67804
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mario Charest wrote:
>>>>>>>> Can you send the 7za binary please?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There you go
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> OSTech
>>>>>>> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28118
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OSTech
>>>>> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28168
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> cburgess@qnx.com
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OSTech
>>>> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28170
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSTech
>>> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28171
>>>
>> --
>> cburgess@qnx.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSTech
>> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28172
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSTech
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28173
> 

-- 
cburgess@qnx.com
Ryan Mansfield(deleted)
04/29/2009 3:45 PM
post28396
Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type   
Mario,

Can you try the attached libcpp.so.4?

Regards,

Ryan Mansfield
Attachment: Text libcpp.so.4 723.62 KB
Mario Charest
04/29/2009 3:51 PM
post28398
RE: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type   

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Mansfield [mailto:community-noreply@qnx.com]
> Sent: April-29-09 3:46 PM
> To: ostech-core_os
> Subject: Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type
> 
> Mario,
> 
> Can you try the attached libcpp.so.4?
> 

It works!

> Regards,
> 
> Ryan Mansfield
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSTech
> http://community.qnx.com/sf/go/post28396
Ryan Mansfield(deleted)
04/29/2009 3:52 PM
post28400
Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type   
Mario Charest wrote:
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ryan Mansfield [mailto:community-noreply@qnx.com]
>> Sent: April-29-09 3:46 PM
>> To: ostech-core_os
>> Subject: Re: 6.4.1 M4 bad weak relocation type
>>
>> Mario,
>>
>> Can you try the attached libcpp.so.4?
>>
> 
> It works!

OK, thanks for the confirmation. The fix should be available in M6.

Regards,

Ryan Mansfield

Return


  A subsidiary of BlackBerry             All content ©2004-2013, QNX Software Systems